Assessment Name | KPI Title | Additional Guidance | Related Information 1 | Link Description 1 | URL 1 | Related Information 2 | Link Description 2 | URL 2 | Related Information 3 | Link Description 3 | URL 3 | Related Information 4 | Link Description 4 | URL 4 | Related Information 5 | Link Description 5 | URL 5 | Related Information 6 | Link Description 6 | URL 6 | Related Information 7 | Link Description 7 | URL 7 | Related Information 8 | Link Description 8 | URL 8 | Related Information 9 | Link Description 9 | URL 9 | Related Information 10 | Link Description 10 | URL 10 | Related Information 11 | Link Description 11 | URL 11 | Related Information 12 | Link Description 12 | URL 12 | Related Information 13 | Link Description 13 | URL 13 | Related Information 14 | Link Description 14 | URL 14 | Related Information 15 | Link Description 15 | URL 15 | Related Information 16 | Link Description 16 | URL 16 | Related Information 17 | Link Description 17 | URL 17 | Related Information 18 | Link Description 18 | URL 18 | Related Information 19 | Link Description 19 | URL 19 | Related Information 20 | Source 20 | Link Description 20 | URL 20 | Related Information 21 | Source 21 | Link Description 21 | URL 21 | Related Information 22 | Source 22 | Link Description 22 | URL 22 | Related Information 23 | Source 23 | Link Description 23 | URL 23 | Related Information 24 | Source 24 | Link Description 24 | URL 24 | Related Information 25 | Source 25 | Link Description 25 | URL 25 | Related Information 26 | Source 26 | Link Description 26 | URL 26 | Related Information 27 | Source 27 | Link Description 27 | URL 27 | Related Information 28 | Source 28 | Link Description 28 | URL 28 | Related Information 29 | Source 29 | Link Description 29 | URL 29 | Related Information 30 | Source 30 | Link Description 30 | URL 30 | Related Information 31 | Source 31 | Link Description 31 | URL 31 | Related Information 32 | Source 32 | Link Description 32 | URL 32 | Related Information 33 | Source 33 | Link Description 33 | URL 33 | Related Information 34 | Source 34 | Link Description 34 | URL 34 | Related Information 35 | Source 35 | Link Description 35 | URL 35 | Related Information 36 | Source 36 | Link Description 36 | URL 36 | Related Information 37 | Source 37 | Link Description 37 | URL 37 | Related Information 38 | Source 38 | Link Description 38 | URL 38 | Related Information 39 | Source 39 | Link Description 39 | URL 39 | Related Information 40 | Source 40 | Link Description 40 | URL 40 | Related Information 41 | Source 41 | Link Description 41 | URL 41 | Related Information 42 | Source 42 | Link Description 42 | URL 42 | Related Information 43 | Source 43 | Link Description 43 | URL 43 | Related Information 44 | Source 44 | Link Description 44 | URL 44 | Related Information 45 | Source 45 | Link Description 45 | URL 45 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Refrigeration Appliances | Animal testing - Alternative approaches | Calculate B1 as the mass of refrigerants purchased from companies that minimize animal testing on their refrigerants divided by the total mass of refrigerants purchased, then multiply by 100. Include in your calculation refrigerants supplied by external and internal suppliers._x000D_ "Companies that minimize animal testing" are defined as those who never use animal testing for refrigerant toxicity endpoints where legally sanctioned validated alternatives exist or where there is no legal requirement to do so._x000D_ Determine relevant toxicity endpoints and their validation status according to local and regional regulatory agencies or authorities. A starting point for understanding relevant toxicity endpoints and animal alternatives along with their validation status can be found at AltTox.org - Toxicity Endpoints & Tests listed in the Background Information. Information on which animal tests were performed on a given refrigerant can often be found on product safety data sheets._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Japanese Center for Validation of Alternative Methods (JaCVAM) | JaCVAM is an institute that is dedicated to the promotion of the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animal testing used to justify chemical safety in Japan. This mission is achieved in part through international collaboration. | https://www.jacvam.jp/en/index.html | The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) | ICCVAM is an interagency committee composed of representatives from 15 U.S. federal regulatory and research agencies that require, use, generate, or disseminate toxicological and safety testing information used to determine the safety or potential adverse health effects of chemicals and products to which workers and consumers may be exposed. | https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/niceatm/iccvam/index.html | European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM) | EURL ECVAM is dedicated to the advancement of animal testing alternatives by promoting non-animal alternatives through scientific research, validation, and independent evaluation. ECVAM’s ultimate goal is enhanced safety at multiple life cycle stages with decreased reliance on animal testing. | https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/ecvam | AltTox.org - Toxicity Endpoints & Tests | AltTox.org is dedicated to the exchange of information associated with non-animal methods of toxicity testing. The Toxicity Endpoints & Tests site provides an overview of applicable toxicity endpoints and non-animal alternatives along with their validation status. | http://alttox.org/mapp/toxicity-endpoints-tests/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Cold water wash | This question only applies to washing machines. _x000D_ Calculate D1 as the number of units sold that default to a cold-water-wash program divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. _x000D_ "Cold water wash" means that the initial water temperature for the wash cycle is 65oF-85oF, as indicated by the clothing care label symbol and text for "machine wash cold". | ASTM Standard Guide for Care Symbols for Care Instructions on Textile Products | The section "Significance and Use" provides a guide to a system of symbols used for communicating care instructions for textile products that is simple, space-saving, in an easily understood pictorial format that is not language dependent. | https://www.astm.org/Standards/D5489.htm | I prefer 30 | The "I prefer 30" campaign is a consumer-facing European initiative to encourage consumers to set their machines to a cold water wash setting. | https://iprefer30.eu/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above._x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above._x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Displays | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electric Toothbrushes and Powered Oral Care Products | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Care Appliances | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitchen Appliances | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mobile Electronics | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Small Appliances | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal Care Appliances | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Televisions | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | THESIS Help Center Video: Conflict minerals KPI | Short video tutorial on the Conflict minerals KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017273 | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Game Consoles | Conflict minerals | Calculate D1 as the total number of validated smelters, divided by the total number of smelters, then multiply by 100. Include all smelters identified as supplying some portion of the tin, tungsten, tantalum, or gold in your products. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ To be considered conflict-free, smelters must have a valid certification established or confirmed in the previous 12-month period as defined above. _x000D_ Smelters may be validated through any internationally recognized body, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), Responsible Jewellery Council, ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group, or the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA). | Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) chain-of-custody certification | The Responsible Jewellery Council is a standard-setting and certification organization that has developed an ISEAL-accredited chain-of-custody certification program for use by the jewellery industry and manufacturers, which applies to gold and platinum group metals. | https://www.responsiblejewellery.com/rjc-certification/ | Better Sourcing Program | The Better Sourcing Program (BSP) provides a technology-based communications solution to allow global organizations to source artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) ores through upstream due diligence, auditing and risk management. | https://www.rcsglobal.com/bettersourcing/ | ITA Responsible Tin Supply Group | The International Tin Association (ITA) has convened the Responsible Tin Supply Group (RTS) to enable organizations to source cassiterite (ore from which tin is derived) from responsible supply chain actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries while meeting due diligence guidance developed by the UN and OECD and required by national laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. | https://www.internationaltin.org/rts-group/ | World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard | As part of their activities to support socially-responsible gold mining, the World Gold Council has developed the World Gold Council Conflict-Free Gold Standard to provide guidance to companies on responsible mining practices. | https://www.gold.org/about-gold/gold-supply/responsible-gold/conflict-free-gold-standard | Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) | Formerly known as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is a joint effort between the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and GeSI to establish supply chain transparency tools, resources and training to assist organizations in responsibly sourcing conflict-free minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. Of note is their Responsible Minerals Assurance Process, which enables auditing and assessment of smelters for responsible ore sourcing and provides a centralized database for tracking smelter performance. | http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/ | Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade | According to the website, "The Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PPA) is a joint initiative among governments, companies, and civil society to support supply chain solutions to conflict minerals challenges in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Great Lakes Region (GLR) of Central Africa." | http://www.resolv.org/site-ppa/ | OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas | Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has developed due diligence guidelines for organizations to implement when sourcing minerals from conflict regions, including but not limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. These guidelines have become normative in the industry and can be used to demonstrate due diligence under national and regional laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the U.S. and the European Commission draft proposal for supply chain due diligence for conflict minerals. | http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/mining.htm | The London Bullion Market Association Good Delivery Lists | According to their website, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) produces "Good Delivery Lists for gold and silver bars; detailing the names of accredited refiners, their listing date and the marking details of their bars." | http://www.lbma.org.uk/good-delivery-list | Conflict minerals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Electricity consumption - Product use | This question addresses only products that are certifiable under an in-force ENERGY STAR® product specification._x000D_ Calculate C1 as the total number of product units sold that qualified for ENERGY STAR certification divided by the total number of product units sold, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Products must be certified to the version of the ENERGY STAR specification that was in force when the product was manufactured. Products may also be counted toward this percentage if they meet the criteria and are tested according to the methodology provided in the appropriate specification or standard, even if they are not certified as such._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electric Toothbrushes and Powered Oral Care Products | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Care Appliances | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitchen Appliances | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mobile Electronics | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Energy Efficiency - Use Phase | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Small Appliances | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal Care Appliances | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Set-top Boxes | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Set-top Boxes include benchmarks for product performance levels as well as incentives to enable "Deep Sleep Mode" for these products. The requirements became effective on September 1, 2011. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/electronics/set_top_boxes_cable_boxes/partners | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Small Network Equipment (SNE) | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Small Network Equipment Version 1.0 include benchmarks for low-traffic rate efficiency as well as incentives to enable "Energy Efficiency Ethernet and External Network Proxy" functionality. The requirements became effective on September 3, 2013. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/data_center_equipment/small_network_equipment/partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy Efficiency - Use Phase | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Set-top Boxes | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Set-top Boxes include benchmarks for product performance levels as well as incentives to enable "Deep Sleep Mode" for these products. The requirements became effective on September 1, 2011. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/electronics/set_top_boxes_cable_boxes/partners | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Small Network Equipment (SNE) | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Small Network Equipment Version 1.0 include benchmarks for low-traffic rate efficiency as well as incentives to enable "Energy Efficiency Ethernet and External Network Proxy" functionality. The requirements became effective on September 3, 2013. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/data_center_equipment/small_network_equipment/partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy Efficiency - Use Phase | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Set-top Boxes | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Set-top Boxes include benchmarks for product performance levels as well as incentives to enable "Deep Sleep Mode" for these products. The requirements became effective on September 1, 2011. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/electronics/set_top_boxes_cable_boxes/partners | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Small Network Equipment (SNE) | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Small Network Equipment Version 1.0 include benchmarks for low-traffic rate efficiency as well as incentives to enable "Energy Efficiency Ethernet and External Network Proxy" functionality. The requirements became effective on September 3, 2013. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/data_center_equipment/small_network_equipment/partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy Efficiency - Use Phase | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Set-top Boxes | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Set-top Boxes include benchmarks for product performance levels as well as incentives to enable "Deep Sleep Mode" for these products. The requirements became effective on September 1, 2011. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/electronics/set_top_boxes_cable_boxes/partners | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Small Network Equipment (SNE) | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Small Network Equipment Version 1.0 include benchmarks for low-traffic rate efficiency as well as incentives to enable "Energy Efficiency Ethernet and External Network Proxy" functionality. The requirements became effective on September 3, 2013. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/data_center_equipment/small_network_equipment/partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy Efficiency - Use Phase | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Set-top Boxes | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Set-top Boxes include benchmarks for product performance levels as well as incentives to enable "Deep Sleep Mode" for these products. The requirements became effective on September 1, 2011. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/electronics/set_top_boxes_cable_boxes/partners | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Small Network Equipment (SNE) | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Small Network Equipment Version 1.0 include benchmarks for low-traffic rate efficiency as well as incentives to enable "Energy Efficiency Ethernet and External Network Proxy" functionality. The requirements became effective on September 3, 2013. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/data_center_equipment/small_network_equipment/partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy Efficiency - Use Phase | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Set-top Boxes | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Set-top Boxes include benchmarks for product performance levels as well as incentives to enable "Deep Sleep Mode" for these products. The requirements became effective on September 1, 2011. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/electronics/set_top_boxes_cable_boxes/partners | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Small Network Equipment (SNE) | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Small Network Equipment Version 1.0 include benchmarks for low-traffic rate efficiency as well as incentives to enable "Energy Efficiency Ethernet and External Network Proxy" functionality. The requirements became effective on September 3, 2013. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/data_center_equipment/small_network_equipment/partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy Efficiency - Use Phase | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Set-top Boxes | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Set-top Boxes include benchmarks for product performance levels as well as incentives to enable "Deep Sleep Mode" for these products. The requirements became effective on September 1, 2011. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/electronics/set_top_boxes_cable_boxes/partners | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Small Network Equipment (SNE) | ENERGY STAR Program Requirements for Small Network Equipment Version 1.0 include benchmarks for low-traffic rate efficiency as well as incentives to enable "Energy Efficiency Ethernet and External Network Proxy" functionality. The requirements became effective on September 3, 2013. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/data_center_equipment/small_network_equipment/partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy Efficiency - Use Phase | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | Energy efficiency - Use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of units that meet the criteria for this question, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with power management or energy efficiency attributes enabled, regardless of whether required by law. Products that are certified to a current in-force version of ENERGY STAR® or an equivalent third-party certified energy efficiency standard count toward this question._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy efficiency attributes | Power management features | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Game Consoles | Energy savings in use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of product units sold that were certified, divided by the total number of product units sold in this category, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Include only products certified to the version of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Recognition for Game Consoles standard that was in force when the product was manufactured._x000D_ In markets not actively participating in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Recognition for Game Consoles program, products may be counted toward this percentage if they meet the criteria, even if they are not certified._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Recognition for Game Consoles | The EPA has developed a voluntary recognition program for game consoles to help improve the energy efficiency of these devices. | https://www.energystar.gov/sites/default/files/specs//private/Final%20Version%201%200%20EPA%20Voluntary%20Criteria%20for%20Energy%20Efficient%20Game%20Consoles.pdf | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | Energy savings in use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of product units that were sold that had ENERGY STAR® certification, divided by the total number of product units sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include only products certified to the version of the ENERGY STAR standard that was in force when the product was manufactured._x000D_ In markets not actively participating in the ENERGY STAR program (i.e., the United States and countries listed as ENERGY STAR International Partners), products may be counted toward this percentage if they meet the criteria in the appropriate ENERGY STAR standard, even if they are not ENERGY STAR-certified. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy Efficiency - Use Phase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Displays | Energy savings in use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of product units that were sold that had ENERGY STAR® certification, divided by the total number of product units sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include only products certified to the version of the ENERGY STAR standard that was in force when the product was manufactured._x000D_ In markets not actively participating in the ENERGY STAR program (i.e., the United States and countries listed as ENERGY STAR International Partners), products may be counted toward this percentage if they meet the criteria in the appropriate ENERGY STAR standard, even if they are not ENERGY STAR-certified. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy Efficiency - Use Phase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Energy savings in use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of product units that were sold that had ENERGY STAR® certification, divided by the total number of product units sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include only products certified to the version of the ENERGY STAR standard that was in force when the product was manufactured._x000D_ In markets not actively participating in the ENERGY STAR program (i.e., the United States and countries listed as ENERGY STAR International Partners), products may be counted toward this percentage if they meet the criteria in the appropriate ENERGY STAR standard, even if they are not ENERGY STAR-certified. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy Efficiency - Use Phase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Televisions | Energy savings in use phase | Calculate B1 as the total number of product units that were sold that had ENERGY STAR® certification, divided by the total number of product units sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include only products certified to the version of the ENERGY STAR standard that was in force when the product was manufactured._x000D_ In markets not actively participating in the ENERGY STAR program (i.e., the United States and countries listed as ENERGY STAR International Partners), products may be counted toward this percentage if they meet the criteria in the appropriate ENERGY STAR standard, even if they are not ENERGY STAR-certified. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products/spec | ENERGY STAR® International Partners | The EPA enters into agreements with foreign governments to use and/or recognize the ENERGY STAR standards and mark to help unify voluntary energy-efficiency initiatives globally. | https://www.energystar.gov/partner_resources/international_partners | Energy Efficiency - Use Phase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, that meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ In the rare circumstance that a facility uses no F-GHGs in any process for any component in products included in this category, that facility may be counted as having 100% abatement._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | World Semiconductor Council - Best Practice Guidance of PFC Emission Reduction | The World Semiconductor Council has developed a set of best known practices related to reducing fluorinated greenhouse gas emissions from equipment and manufacturing processes to support their members in efforts to meet their voluntary perfluoro-compound emission reduction targets. | http://www.semiconductorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Best-Practice-Guidance-of-PFC-Emission-Reduction.pdf | World LCD Industry Cooperation Committee | The "principal mission of WLICC is to address efforts and share understanding on issues concerning environmental protection and resource recycling within the LCD industry." In 2010, the organization published results of their member's F-GHG reduction efforts. | http://home.jeita.or.jp/device/committee/kankyou/pdf/20111110WLICG_e.pdf | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, that meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ In the rare circumstance that a facility uses no F-GHGs in any process for any component in products included in this category, that facility may be counted as having 100% abatement._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | World Semiconductor Council - Best Practice Guidance of PFC Emission Reduction | The World Semiconductor Council has developed a set of best known practices related to reducing fluorinated greenhouse gas emissions from equipment and manufacturing processes to support their members in efforts to meet their voluntary perfluoro-compound emission reduction targets. | http://www.semiconductorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Best-Practice-Guidance-of-PFC-Emission-Reduction.pdf | World LCD Industry Cooperation Committee | The "principal mission of WLICC is to address efforts and share understanding on issues concerning environmental protection and resource recycling within the LCD industry." In 2010, the organization published results of their member's F-GHG reduction efforts. | http://home.jeita.or.jp/device/committee/kankyou/pdf/20111110WLICG_e.pdf | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, that meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ In the rare circumstance that a facility uses no F-GHGs in any process for any component in products included in this category, that facility may be counted as having 100% abatement._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | World Semiconductor Council - Best Practice Guidance of PFC Emission Reduction | The World Semiconductor Council has developed a set of best known practices related to reducing fluorinated greenhouse gas emissions from equipment and manufacturing processes to support their members in efforts to meet their voluntary perfluoro-compound emission reduction targets. | http://www.semiconductorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Best-Practice-Guidance-of-PFC-Emission-Reduction.pdf | World LCD Industry Cooperation Committee | The "principal mission of WLICC is to address efforts and share understanding on issues concerning environmental protection and resource recycling within the LCD industry." In 2010, the organization published results of their member's F-GHG reduction efforts. | http://home.jeita.or.jp/device/committee/kankyou/pdf/20111110WLICG_e.pdf | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, that meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ In the rare circumstance that a facility uses no F-GHGs in any process for any component in products included in this category, that facility may be counted as having 100% abatement._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | World Semiconductor Council - Best Practice Guidance of PFC Emission Reduction | The World Semiconductor Council has developed a set of best known practices related to reducing fluorinated greenhouse gas emissions from equipment and manufacturing processes to support their members in efforts to meet their voluntary perfluoro-compound emission reduction targets. | http://www.semiconductorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Best-Practice-Guidance-of-PFC-Emission-Reduction.pdf | World LCD Industry Cooperation Committee | The "principal mission of WLICC is to address efforts and share understanding on issues concerning environmental protection and resource recycling within the LCD industry." In 2010, the organization published results of their member's F-GHG reduction efforts. | http://home.jeita.or.jp/device/committee/kankyou/pdf/20111110WLICG_e.pdf | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, that meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ In the rare circumstance that a facility uses no F-GHGs in any process for any component in products included in this category, that facility may be counted as having 100% abatement._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | World Semiconductor Council - Best Practice Guidance of PFC Emission Reduction | The World Semiconductor Council has developed a set of best known practices related to reducing fluorinated greenhouse gas emissions from equipment and manufacturing processes to support their members in efforts to meet their voluntary perfluoro-compound emission reduction targets. | http://www.semiconductorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Best-Practice-Guidance-of-PFC-Emission-Reduction.pdf | World LCD Industry Cooperation Committee | The "principal mission of WLICC is to address efforts and share understanding on issues concerning environmental protection and resource recycling within the LCD industry." In 2010, the organization published results of their member's F-GHG reduction efforts. | http://home.jeita.or.jp/device/committee/kankyou/pdf/20111110WLICG_e.pdf | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, that meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ In the rare circumstance that a facility uses no F-GHGs in any process for any component in products included in this category, that facility may be counted as having 100% abatement._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | World Semiconductor Council - Best Practice Guidance of PFC Emission Reduction | The World Semiconductor Council has developed a set of best known practices related to reducing fluorinated greenhouse gas emissions from equipment and manufacturing processes to support their members in efforts to meet their voluntary perfluoro-compound emission reduction targets. | http://www.semiconductorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Best-Practice-Guidance-of-PFC-Emission-Reduction.pdf | World LCD Industry Cooperation Committee | The "principal mission of WLICC is to address efforts and share understanding on issues concerning environmental protection and resource recycling within the LCD industry." In 2010, the organization published results of their member's F-GHG reduction efforts. | http://home.jeita.or.jp/device/committee/kankyou/pdf/20111110WLICG_e.pdf | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, that meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ In the rare circumstance that a facility uses no F-GHGs in any process for any component in products included in this category, that facility may be counted as having 100% abatement._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | World Semiconductor Council - Best Practice Guidance of PFC Emission Reduction | The World Semiconductor Council has developed a set of best known practices related to reducing fluorinated greenhouse gas emissions from equipment and manufacturing processes to support their members in efforts to meet their voluntary perfluoro-compound emission reduction targets. | http://www.semiconductorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Best-Practice-Guidance-of-PFC-Emission-Reduction.pdf | World LCD Industry Cooperation Committee | The "principal mission of WLICC is to address efforts and share understanding on issues concerning environmental protection and resource recycling within the LCD industry." In 2010, the organization published results of their member's F-GHG reduction efforts. | http://home.jeita.or.jp/device/committee/kankyou/pdf/20111110WLICG_e.pdf | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | World LCD Industry Cooperation Committee | The "principal mission of WLICC is to address efforts and share understanding on issues concerning environmental protection and resource recycling within the LCD industry." In 2010, the organization published results of their member's F-GHG reduction efforts. | http://home.jeita.or.jp/device/committee/kankyou/pdf/20111110WLICG_e.pdf | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Displays | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | World LCD Industry Cooperation Committee | The "principal mission of WLICC is to address efforts and share understanding on issues concerning environmental protection and resource recycling within the LCD industry." In 2010, the organization published results of their member's F-GHG reduction efforts. | http://home.jeita.or.jp/device/committee/kankyou/pdf/20111110WLICG_e.pdf | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mobile Electronics | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | World LCD Industry Cooperation Committee | The "principal mission of WLICC is to address efforts and share understanding on issues concerning environmental protection and resource recycling within the LCD industry." In 2010, the organization published results of their member's F-GHG reduction efforts. | http://home.jeita.or.jp/device/committee/kankyou/pdf/20111110WLICG_e.pdf | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Televisions | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | Center for Corporate Climate Leadership | According to this website, "The EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership seeks to highlight activities to reduce supply chain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the sector level." The first efforts to be highlighted within the electronics industry are the efforts by suppliers to reduce F-GHGs during manufacturing of flat panel display in the electronics sector. | https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | World LCD Industry Cooperation Committee | The "principal mission of WLICC is to address efforts and share understanding on issues concerning environmental protection and resource recycling within the LCD industry." In 2010, the organization published results of their member's F-GHG reduction efforts. | http://home.jeita.or.jp/device/committee/kankyou/pdf/20111110WLICG_e.pdf | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Game Consoles | F-GHG emission tracking and reporting | Calculate percentage of components, by units procured for products in this category, which meet the criteria for this question as the number of suppliers that abate all F-GHGs in at least 50% of their facilities divided by the total number of suppliers responsible for all relevant components and multiply the result by 100. For example: if four suppliers provide all relevant components and one does nothing, one abates only PFCs, and the remaining 2 abate all gases in 40% and 70% of their facilities, respectively, the correct percentage is 25% because only one supplier meets both criteria._x000D_ Relevant components specifically refer to flat panel displays and semiconductor electronic components or devices whose manufacture is known to use and emit fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs), namely during etch and chamber clean processes. _x000D_ Abate all F-GHG emissions means that the component supplier abates all of the following F-GHGs in at least half of their facilities that manufacture relevant components for this product category: perfluorocarbons (PFCs), trifluoromethane (CHF3 or HFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | European Semiconductor Industry - PFC Emission Reduction | The European Semiconductor Industry Association (ESIA) has provided information regarding successful PFC emissions reduction programs in Europe, and steps the industry is taking beyond its voluntary 2010 reduction goals. | https://www.eusemiconductors.eu/esia/public-policy/sustainability-esh/pfc-gases | PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry | The United States Environmental Protection Agency supports the voluntary efforts to reduce fluorinated greenhouse gas (F-GHG) emissions from semiconductor industry through the PFC Reduction/Climate Partnership for the Semiconductor Industry. | https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases#f-gases | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-GHGs) | Manufacturing facility partners | Component supplier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions - Insulation supply | This question covers greenhouse gas emissions for suppliers of isocyanates and polyols to polyurethane and polyisocyanurate foam manufacturers, whether these are internal or external suppliers to the foam manufacturer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass purchased from insulation suppliers whose raw materials suppliers report their emissions divided by total mass purchased from all foam suppliers, then multiply by 100. For the mass of a manufacturer's product to count toward C1, they must have visibility on whether at least 50% of their raw material suppliers are reporting greenhouse gas emissions. _x000D_ Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions - Metal supply | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Included in scope are facilities in your supply chain that perform casting or forming of aluminum and steel, including that which is embedded in finished components, such as motors. Calculate B1 as the mass purchased from metal suppliers that reported emissions divided by total mass purchased from all metal suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions - Metal supply | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Included in scope are facilities in your supply chain that perform casting or forming of aluminum and steel, including that which is embedded in finished components, such as motors. Calculate B1 as the mass purchased from metal suppliers that reported emissions divided by total mass purchased from all metal suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse gas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions - Refrigerants and blowing agents | Include data for any products you manufacture as well as those produced by final manufacturing facilities not within your organization’s financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers)._x000D_ Calculate B1 by first multiplying the mass, in kilograms, of each refrigerant used in your products by its global warming potential, then summing these values. Divide the sum by the total mass, in kilograms, of products you manufactured in this category. The resulting value will already be expressed in the appropriate units of kg CO2e per kilogram of product. Use 100-year global warming potential values as provided in Table 8.A.1 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) 2013 Working Group 1: "Lifetimes, Radiative Efficiencies and Metric Values." Another source may be used only if values for a particular refrigerant are not provided by the IPCC report. This calculation is similar to that described in Annex C.5 of the ANSI/AHAM 7001-2015 standard. _x000D_ Calculate B2 as the mass of refrigerants and blowing agents for which global warming potential data is being reported divided by the total mass of refrigerants and blowing agents used._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ANSI-AHAM 7001-2015 | This ANSI-AHAM sustainability standard is used to evaluate the environmental sustainability of household refrigeration appliances across the product life cycle. | https://www.aham.org/ItemDetail?iProductCode=10001&Category=SUSSTD | IPCC Fifth Assessment Report | The International Panel on Climate Change's Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) provides information on the scientific, technical, and socio-economic impacts of climate change. | http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Displays | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electric Toothbrushes and Powered Oral Care Products | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Care Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitchen Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mobile Electronics | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Small Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal Care Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Televisions | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Game Consoles | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printer Ink | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). Calculate B1 as the total procurement spend on ingredient suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all ingredient suppliers, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). _x000D_ Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. _x000D_ If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). _x000D_ Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. _x000D_ If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). _x000D_ Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. _x000D_ If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). _x000D_ Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. _x000D_ If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). _x000D_ Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. _x000D_ If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). _x000D_ Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. _x000D_ If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | Greenhouse gas emissions - Supply chain | Scope 1 and 2 emissions are defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015). _x000D_ Calculate B1 as the procurement spend on component suppliers that reported emissions, divided by total procurement spend on all component suppliers, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Component suppliers means the group of suppliers that account for 80% of your total spend on components purchased for products in this category._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. _x000D_ If suppliers completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, refer to C6.1 and C6.3 to determine if they report emissions. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in scope for this questionnaire, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits._x000D_ You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products._x000D_ If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce both in scope and out of scope products, only weight using the total spend required to produce the in scope products._x000D_ Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. _x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | CO2e | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in scope for this questionnaire, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits._x000D_ You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products._x000D_ If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce both in scope and out of scope products, only weight using the total spend required to produce the in scope products._x000D_ Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. _x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | CO2e | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in scope for this questionnaire, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits._x000D_ You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products._x000D_ If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce both in scope and out of scope products, only weight using the total spend required to produce the in scope products._x000D_ Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. _x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | CO2e | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in scope for this questionnaire, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits._x000D_ You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products._x000D_ If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce both in scope and out of scope products, only weight using the total spend required to produce the in scope products._x000D_ Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. _x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | CO2e | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in scope for this questionnaire, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits._x000D_ You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products._x000D_ If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce both in scope and out of scope products, only weight using the total spend required to produce the in scope products._x000D_ Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. _x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | CO2e | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in scope for this questionnaire, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits._x000D_ You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products._x000D_ If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce both in scope and out of scope products, only weight using the total spend required to produce the in scope products._x000D_ Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. _x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | CO2e | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in scope for this questionnaire, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits._x000D_ You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products._x000D_ If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce both in scope and out of scope products, only weight using the total spend required to produce the in scope products._x000D_ Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. _x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | CO2e | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Displays | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electric Toothbrushes and Powered Oral Care Products | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Care Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitchen Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mobile Electronics | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Small Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal Care Appliances | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printer Ink | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Televisions | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Game Consoles | Greenhouse gas emissions intensity - Manufacturing | Included in the scope of this question are fuels combusted and electricity used in facilities that perform final manufacturing activities, including product assembly and the manufacture of any components purchased directly by your organization for inclusion in products in this category, as well as trace gases released during manufacture. This may include some or all of your organization's corporate scope 1 and 2 emissions, as well as scope 1 and 2 emissions from any final manufacturing facilities not within your organization's financial or operational control (e.g., contract manufacturers). Excluded from the scope of this question are GHG allowances, offsets, and credits. You may calculate B1 using product-specific data or estimate intensity via facility data that is not product specific. If using product-specific data, calculate B1 as the average of each product's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the products. If using facility data, calculate B1 as the average of each final manufacturing facility's greenhouse gas emissions intensity, weighted by the total spend required to produce the product. If the manufacturing facilities produce more than one category of product, only weight using the total spend required to produce the product specific to the product category in question. Calculate B2 as the total spend on final products for which you are able to obtain data, divided by total spend for final products produced, then multiply by 100. For each final manufacturing facility, follow the instructions in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard (2015) to calculate scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions generated from electricity purchased or produced, fuels combusted, and trace gases released, and then add them together. Worksheets are available on the GHG Protocol web site to facilitate these calculations. Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. The data required for the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire combined with production data can be used to calculate your response (refer to C7.3b and C7.6b). The data required for "Disclosure 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization" in GRI 302: Energy 2016 or "Disclosure 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions" and "Disclosure 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions" in GRI 305: Emissions 2016 can also be used to calculate your response. | GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines | The GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines provide a standard set of metrics for companies to report on material environmental, social, and economic impacts, actions, and outcomes. | https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/ | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Standard | The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol provides guidance and is a useful resource published by the World Resources Institute with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development as a guide for monitoring and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions. | https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | Greenhouse gas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as a carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | Scivera Lens™ Rapid Screen | The Scivera Lens Rapid Screen tool provides access to chemical ingredient toxicological hazard and risk assessment profiles using a product's bill of materials or bill of substances._x000D_ | https://www.scivera.com/rapidscreen/ | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | CCS Enhanced GreenSuite® | Enhanced GreenSuite® is a web-based chemical and product hazard and risk assessment tool developmed by Chemical Compliance Systems (CCS). | https://www.chemply.com/greensuite | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as a carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | Scivera Lens™ Rapid Screen | The Scivera Lens Rapid Screen tool provides access to chemical ingredient toxicological hazard and risk assessment profiles using a product's bill of materials or bill of substances._x000D_ | https://www.scivera.com/rapidscreen/ | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | CCS Enhanced GreenSuite® | Enhanced GreenSuite® is a web-based chemical and product hazard and risk assessment tool developmed by Chemical Compliance Systems (CCS). | https://www.chemply.com/greensuite | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as a carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | Scivera Lens™ Rapid Screen | The Scivera Lens Rapid Screen tool provides access to chemical ingredient toxicological hazard and risk assessment profiles using a product's bill of materials or bill of substances._x000D_ | https://www.scivera.com/rapidscreen/ | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | CCS Enhanced GreenSuite® | Enhanced GreenSuite® is a web-based chemical and product hazard and risk assessment tool developmed by Chemical Compliance Systems (CCS). | https://www.chemply.com/greensuite | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as a carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | Scivera Lens™ Rapid Screen | The Scivera Lens Rapid Screen tool provides access to chemical ingredient toxicological hazard and risk assessment profiles using a product's bill of materials or bill of substances._x000D_ | https://www.scivera.com/rapidscreen/ | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | CCS Enhanced GreenSuite® | Enhanced GreenSuite® is a web-based chemical and product hazard and risk assessment tool developmed by Chemical Compliance Systems (CCS). | https://www.chemply.com/greensuite | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as a carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | Scivera Lens™ Rapid Screen | The Scivera Lens Rapid Screen tool provides access to chemical ingredient toxicological hazard and risk assessment profiles using a product's bill of materials or bill of substances._x000D_ | https://www.scivera.com/rapidscreen/ | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | CCS Enhanced GreenSuite® | Enhanced GreenSuite® is a web-based chemical and product hazard and risk assessment tool developmed by Chemical Compliance Systems (CCS). | https://www.chemply.com/greensuite | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as a carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | Scivera Lens™ Rapid Screen | The Scivera Lens Rapid Screen tool provides access to chemical ingredient toxicological hazard and risk assessment profiles using a product's bill of materials or bill of substances._x000D_ | https://www.scivera.com/rapidscreen/ | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | CCS Enhanced GreenSuite® | Enhanced GreenSuite® is a web-based chemical and product hazard and risk assessment tool developmed by Chemical Compliance Systems (CCS). | https://www.chemply.com/greensuite | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as a carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | Scivera Lens™ Rapid Screen | The Scivera Lens Rapid Screen tool provides access to chemical ingredient toxicological hazard and risk assessment profiles using a product's bill of materials or bill of substances._x000D_ | https://www.scivera.com/rapidscreen/ | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | CCS Enhanced GreenSuite® | Enhanced GreenSuite® is a web-based chemical and product hazard and risk assessment tool developmed by Chemical Compliance Systems (CCS). | https://www.chemply.com/greensuite | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Displays | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electric Toothbrushes and Powered Oral Care Products | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Care Appliances | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitchen Appliances | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mobile Electronics | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Small Appliances | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal Care Appliances | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) | The Protocol for Measuring Destruction or Removal Efficiency (DRE) of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Abatement Equipment in Electronics Manufacturing was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a standard approach to measure F-GHG emissions at the point of abatement in the electronics component manufacturing facility. | https://www.epa.gov/f-gas-partnership-programs/epas-protocol-measuring-destruction-or-removal-efficiency | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printer Ink | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Televisions | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Game Consoles | Hazardous substances - Alternatives assessment | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | PRIO | PRIO is a web-based tool developed by the Swedish government to facilitate the assessment of environmental and health risks of chemicals. ? | https://www.kemi.se/prioguiden/english/start | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Existing Chemicals Program | According to their website, "EPA's existing chemical programs address pollution prevention, risk assessment, hazard and exposure assessment and characterization, and risk management for chemical substances in commercial use." The current chemicals management program is undergoing review and update, including how the agency identifies and prioritizes priority chemicals for review and assessment under TSCA. | https://www.epa.gov/compliance/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-compliance-monitoring#chemicals | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Exposure Assessment Tools and Models | According to their website, "The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has developed several exposure assessment methods, databases, and predictive models to help in evaluating what happens to chemicals when they are used and released to the environment and how workers, the general public, consumers and the aquatic ecosystems may be exposed to chemicals." | https://www.epa.gov/ceam/tools-data-exposure-assessment | The Guide to Safer Chemicals | The Guide to Safer Chemicals provides guidance on how to design and implement a chemicals management program based on the Principles for Safer Chemicals. The Principles and Guide were developed by BizNGO, a collaboration of business and NGO leaders to create and adopt "safer chemicals and sustainable materials." | https://www.bizngo.org/safer-chemicals/guide-to-safer-chemicals | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | REACH | A Priority Chemical is defined as a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). Priority Chemicals are identified on a case-by-case basis. | http://www.reachonline.eu/REACH/EN/REACH_EN/article57.html | Informed substitution | Public disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printer Ink | Hazardous substances - Carbon black | Hazardous substances are defined as chemicals that meet the criteria for classification as carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, or are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemicals for which there is "scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern" (REACH Title VII, Chapter 1, Article 57). | International Finance Corporation: Environmental, Health, and Safety General Guidelines | These General EHS Guidelines contain the performance levels and measures that are generally considered to be achievable. | https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/policies-standards/ehs-guidelines | Environmental Protection Agency National Ambient Air Quality Standards | According to the EPA's website, "The Clean Air Act, which was last amended in 1990, requires the EPA to set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (40 CFR part 50) for pollutants considered harmful to public health and the environment. The Clean Air Act identifies two types of national ambient air quality standards. Primary standards provide public health protection, including protecting the health of 'sensitive' populations such as asthmatics, children, and the elderly. Secondary standards provide public welfare protection, including protection against decreased visibility and damage to animals, crops, vegetation, and buildings." | https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of component suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | Component supplier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of component suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of component suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | Component supplier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Displays | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electric Toothbrushes and Powered Oral Care Products | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Care Appliances | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitchen Appliances | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mobile Electronics | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Small Appliances | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal Care Appliances | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printer Ink | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Televisions | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Game Consoles | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | Hazardous substances - Disclosure | Calculate B1 as the number of suppliers which have provided disclosure information, divided by the total number of suppliers, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract component manufacturers, as well as organizations contracted for direct material supply to company-owned or contract manufacturers. To be included in this percentage, a supplier must disclose intentionally-added materials listed in the declarable substance groups and declarable substances above the thresholds specified in IEC 62474._x000D_ Suppliers who only report substances whose declaration is already mandated by relevant regulations in the market(s) of sale (e.g., by RoHS Directive) should not be considered as having provided disclosure. If an organization has not adopted IEC 62474, suppliers who report declarable substances in line with the declarable substances list in IEC 62474 can count as having provided disclosure. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Panasonic Corporation Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines | "The Chemical Substances Management Rank Guide," published by the Industrial Devices Company Group, Panasonic Corporation, is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.panasonic.com/global/corporate/management/procurement/green.html | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | Dell, Inc. Materials Restricted for Use | "Materials Restricted for Use," published by Dell, Inc., is one example of an internal hazardous substances management list used within the electronics industry. | https://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/restricted_materials_guid.pdf | International Electrotechnical Commission Standard 62474:2012 | International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 62474 "specifies the procedure, content, and form relating to material declarations for products of companies operating in and supplying the electrotechnical industry" designed to provide downstream manufacturers information regarding restriction compliance requirements and material appropriateness for environmentally conscious design. | https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/7077 | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Indoor air quality - Printing | Calculate B1 as the number of products that meet both the chemical and particulate rate defined by the Blue Angel standard for Office Equipment with Printing Function, divided by the total number of units sold, then multiply by 100. To qualify as having met or exceeded the the specified emission rates for this question, the products must be tested in accordance with the version of the Blue Angel/RAL-UZ that was in force at the time of product manufacture._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | RAL-UZ 171 | Office Equipment with Printing Function (Printers, Copiers, Multifunctional Devices) provides the benchmarks and testing procedures to determine a product's contribution to indoor air pollution. | https://www.ecomark.jp/pdf/171-1207-e.pdf | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Maintenance and refurbishment | This question addresses the components and subassemblies of the appliance itself, and not its packaging materials, service manual, or other similar materials. _x000D_ Calculate B1 by dividing the mass of components and subassemblies that are readily available for repair, refurbishment, or replacement by the total mass of the product, then multiplying by 100. Treat components or subassemblies about which this information is unknown as not readily available for repair, refurbishment, or replacement._x000D_ “Readily available” means that a third-party or consumer equipped with commercially available tools can remove or service the component or subassembly or replace it with a commercially available part. Examples of components and subassemblies include devices, such as motors and circuit boards, and structural components, such as doors and lids. These are often enumerated on a bill of materials. Components or subassemblies that are regulated or require certification for proper maintenance or management, such as refrigerant recovery, count as part of "readily available" components, even though the maintenance activities should be performed only by qualified parties. | THESIS Help Center Video: Maintenance and refurbishment KPI | Short video tutorial on the Maintenance and refurbishment KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/533750647 | Component | Subassembly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Maintenance and refurbishment | This question addresses the components and subassemblies of the appliance itself, and not its packaging materials, service manual, or other similar materials. _x000D_ Calculate B1 by dividing the mass of components and subassemblies that are readily available for repair, refurbishment, or replacement by the total mass of the product, then multiplying by 100. Treat components or subassemblies about which this information is unknown as not readily available for repair, refurbishment, or replacement._x000D_ “Readily available” means that a third-party or consumer equipped with commercially available tools can remove or service the component or subassembly or replace it with a commercially available part. Examples of components and subassemblies include devices, such as motors and circuit boards, and structural components, such as doors and lids. These are often enumerated on a bill of materials. Components or subassemblies that are regulated or require certification for proper maintenance or management, such as refrigerant recovery, count as part of "readily available" components, even though the maintenance activities should be performed only by qualified parties. | THESIS Help Center Video: Maintenance and refurbishment KPI | Short video tutorial on the Maintenance and refurbishment KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/533750647 | Component | Subassembly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Displays | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mobile Electronics | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Televisions | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Game Consoles | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Takeback program operation | Hazardous materials and components - Used electronics | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | Material disposition tracking - Product takeback program | Final disposition means the point at which 1) a product enters its next life cycle through reuse or refurbishment; 2) the components of a product are recaptured for reuse as part of a refurbishment program; or 3) the product or materials contained within the product reach landfilling, incineration or material recovery where they are returned to the commodity market. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | WEEELABEX | WEEELABEX standards cover the collection, logistics, and treatment of electronic wastes in all ten categories of the European Union's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. | http://www.weeelabex.org/#!standards/component_41229 | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Responsible final disposition | Certified third-party e-waste vendors | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Sustainably-sourced material | Renewable material | Pre-consumer recycled material | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Renewable material | Sustainably-sourced material | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Renewable material | Sustainably-sourced material | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Sustainably-sourced material | Renewable material | Pre-consumer recycled material | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Renewable material | Sustainably-sourced material | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Sustainably-sourced material | Renewable material | Pre-consumer recycled material | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Renewable material | Sustainably-sourced material | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Sustainably-sourced material | Renewable material | Pre-consumer recycled material | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Sustainably-sourced material | Renewable material | Pre-consumer recycled material | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Sustainably-sourced material | Renewable material | Pre-consumer recycled material | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Renewable material | Sustainably-sourced material | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Renewable material | Sustainably-sourced material | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printer Ink | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Sustainably-sourced material | Renewable material | Pre-consumer recycled material | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Sustainably-sourced material | Renewable material | Pre-consumer recycled material | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | Packaging Raw Material Sourcing | The scope of this question is the product category’s sales packaging, which is defined as packaging that leaves a store with the consumer. Include the transportation-related packaging for product that is shipped directly to an end consumer. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. This excludes pre-consumer recycled materials._x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sustainably-sourced renewable virgin material in the sales packaging of your final products, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. To be included in C2, the material must be third-party verified (e.g. for paper-based packaging FSC, SFI, PEFC would be examples of certifications for verification)._x000D_ If data on packaging materials specific to these final products is not available, you may use more aggregated internal data to calculate C1 and C2 (e.g., company-level data for sales packaging of similar products). _x000D_ The sum of C1 and C2 cannot be greater than 100%._x000D_ Please refer to THESIS KPI set for Packaging for more detailed packaging indicators. | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability 2.0 | The Global Protocol for Packaging Sustainability (GPPS 2.0) is a common set of indicators and metrics for business regarding sustainable packaging. The Consumer Goods Forum condensed the "Sustainable Packaging Indicators and Metrics Framework", developed by GreenBlue's Sustainable Packaging Coalition, into GPPS 2.0. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability | The Global Protocol on Packaging Sustainability provides metrics and a framework for businesses on the relative sustainability of packaging. | https://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CGF-Global-Protocol-on-Packaging.pdf | ISO 18604:2013 | ISO 18604:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Material recycling) provides measurement standards for determining how recyclable a particular product is. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55872.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | THESIS Help Center Video: Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI | Short video tutorial on the Packaging Raw Material Sourcing KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/531017161 | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | Post-consumer recycled material | Sales packaging | Renewable material | Sustainably-sourced material | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Paper consumption - Printers | Calculate B1 as the number of units shipped with this default setting, divided by the total number of units shipped, then multiply by 100. Include all units that were shipped with defaults for duplex printing._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Product design | This question does not address packaging materials. Product design strategies may include design for lightweighting, durability, disassembly, reuse, recycled content, and recyclability. _x000D_ _x000D_ | ISO 14044:2006 | ISO 14044:2006 is the International Organization for Standardization's "Requirements and Guidelines" standard for conducting life cycle assessments. | https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html | ISO 14040:2006 | ISO 14040:2006 is the International Organization for Standardization's "Principles and Framework" document for conducting life cycle assessments. | https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html | UN Environment Design for Sustainability: Materials Efficiency | One example of a tool and protocol for material efficiency is included in the Design for Sustainability report published by UN Environment. | https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7961 | Autodesk - Design for Sustainability | Autodesk® Sustainability Workshop provides resources, tools and online learning opportunities to teach the principles of sustainable design. | https://academy.autodesk.com/sustainable-design | Resource conservation | Material and process efficiency | End-of-life | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Product design | This question does not address packaging materials. Product design strategies may include design for lightweighting, durability, disassembly, reuse, recycled content, and recyclability. _x000D_ _x000D_ | ISO 14044:2006 | ISO 14044:2006 is the International Organization for Standardization's "Requirements and Guidelines" standard for conducting life cycle assessments. | https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html | ISO 14040:2006 | ISO 14040:2006 is the International Organization for Standardization's "Principles and Framework" document for conducting life cycle assessments. | https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html | UN Environment Design for Sustainability: Materials Efficiency | One example of a tool and protocol for material efficiency is included in the Design for Sustainability report published by UN Environment. | https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7961 | Autodesk - Design for Sustainability | Autodesk® Sustainability Workshop provides resources, tools and online learning opportunities to teach the principles of sustainable design. | https://academy.autodesk.com/sustainable-design | Resource conservation | Material and process efficiency | End-of-life | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electric Toothbrushes and Powered Oral Care Products | Product design | This question does not address sales packaging, only the appliance itself. _x000D_ Product design strategies may include design for lightweighting, durability, disassembly, reuse, recycled content, recyclability, low component material variability, and material substitution. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | UN Environment Design for Sustainability: Materials Efficiency | One example of a tool and protocol for material efficiency is included in the Design for Sustainability report published by UN Environment. | https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7961 | Autodesk - Design for Sustainability | Autodesk® Sustainability Workshop provides resources, tools and online learning opportunities to teach the principles of sustainable design. | https://academy.autodesk.com/sustainable-design | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Public disclosure | Material and process efficiency | End-of-life | Resource conservation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Care Appliances | Product design | This question does not address sales packaging, only the appliance itself. _x000D_ Product design strategies may include design for lightweighting, durability, disassembly, reuse, recycled content, recyclability, low component material variability, and material substitution. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | UN Environment Design for Sustainability: Materials Efficiency | One example of a tool and protocol for material efficiency is included in the Design for Sustainability report published by UN Environment. | https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7961 | Autodesk - Design for Sustainability | Autodesk® Sustainability Workshop provides resources, tools and online learning opportunities to teach the principles of sustainable design. | https://academy.autodesk.com/sustainable-design | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Public disclosure | Material and process efficiency | End-of-life | Resource conservation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitchen Appliances | Product design | This question does not address sales packaging, only the appliance itself. _x000D_ Product design strategies may include design for lightweighting, durability, disassembly, reuse, recycled content, recyclability, low component material variability, and material substitution. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | UN Environment Design for Sustainability: Materials Efficiency | One example of a tool and protocol for material efficiency is included in the Design for Sustainability report published by UN Environment. | https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7961 | Autodesk - Design for Sustainability | Autodesk® Sustainability Workshop provides resources, tools and online learning opportunities to teach the principles of sustainable design. | https://academy.autodesk.com/sustainable-design | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Public disclosure | Material and process efficiency | End-of-life | Resource conservation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Small Appliances | Product design | This question does not address sales packaging, only the appliance itself. _x000D_ Product design strategies may include design for lightweighting, durability, disassembly, reuse, recycled content, recyclability, low component material variability, and material substitution. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | UN Environment Design for Sustainability: Materials Efficiency | One example of a tool and protocol for material efficiency is included in the Design for Sustainability report published by UN Environment. | https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7961 | Autodesk - Design for Sustainability | Autodesk® Sustainability Workshop provides resources, tools and online learning opportunities to teach the principles of sustainable design. | https://academy.autodesk.com/sustainable-design | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Public disclosure | Material and process efficiency | End-of-life | Resource conservation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal Care Appliances | Product design | This question does not address sales packaging, only the appliance itself. _x000D_ Product design strategies may include design for lightweighting, durability, disassembly, reuse, recycled content, recyclability, low component material variability, and material substitution. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Safer Choice - Alternatives Assessments | The EPA's Safer Choice [formerly Design for the Environment (DfE)] partnership program provides guidance for informed decision-making regarding the hazards posed by different materials used in consumer goods. | https://www.epa.gov/saferchoice | UN Environment Design for Sustainability: Materials Efficiency | One example of a tool and protocol for material efficiency is included in the Design for Sustainability report published by UN Environment. | https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7961 | Autodesk - Design for Sustainability | Autodesk® Sustainability Workshop provides resources, tools and online learning opportunities to teach the principles of sustainable design. | https://academy.autodesk.com/sustainable-design | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Public disclosure | Material and process efficiency | End-of-life | Resource conservation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Product stewardship | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program within the organization. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations when reported in different product category questionnaires. If products under the same category are collected in separate programs, average the recycling performance of the two programs and report that value in C1. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the number of product units returned through the program(s) for recycling divided by the total number of product units sold, then multiply by 100. If this number exceeds 100, report it as 100._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. Data for both the unit volume returned and unit volume sold should come from the same year, even though units may be returned in a different year than they were sold. _x000D_ Examples of stewardship programs include extended producer responsibility programs and product takeback programs. Such programs should ensure that materials are recycled or disposed of in an environmentally sensitive manner. | ANSI-AHAM 7001-2015 | This ANSI-AHAM sustainability standard is used to evaluate the environmental sustainability of household refrigeration appliances across the product life cycle. | https://www.aham.org/ItemDetail?iProductCode=10001&Category=SUSSTD | THESIS Help Center Video: Product Stewardship KPI | Short video tutorial on the Product Stewardship KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/533750712 | Major Appliance Recycling Roundtable | MARR is a non-profit organization in British Columbia dedicated to developing product stewardship solutions for the large appliance manufacturing industry. | http://www.marrbc.ca/ | End-of-life | Product stewardship | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Product stewardship | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program within the organization. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations when reported in different product category questionnaires. If products under the same category are collected in separate programs, average the recycling performance of the two programs and report that value in C1. _x000D_ Calculate C1 as the number of product units returned through the program(s) for recycling divided by the total number of product units sold, then multiply by 100. If this number exceeds 100, report it as 100._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. Data for both the unit volume returned and unit volume sold should come from the same year, even though units may be returned in a different year than they were sold. _x000D_ Examples of stewardship programs include extended producer responsibility programs and product takeback programs. Such programs should ensure that materials are recycled or disposed of in an environmentally sensitive manner. | AHAM 7003-2013 | This sustainability standard from the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers is used to evaluate the environmental sustainability of household clothes washing appliances across the product life cycle. | https://www.aham.org/ItemDetail?iProductCode=10003&Category=SUSSTD | THESIS Help Center Video: Product Stewardship KPI | Short video tutorial on the Product Stewardship KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/533750712 | Major Appliance Recycling Roundtable | MARR is a non-profit organization in British Columbia dedicated to developing product stewardship solutions for the large appliance manufacturing industry. | http://www.marrbc.ca/ | End-of-life | Product stewardship | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. If multiple questionnaires are received, the same percentage may be reported as long as the product types in question are collected and managed in the same program. Otherwise, the responses need to be for percentages appropriate to the different product types associated with each questionnaire. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | HP Product Return and Recycling Program | One example of a manufacturer takeback program is run by HP, where LaserJet and ink cartridges are collected, recycled, and materials used to manufacture new cartridges. | http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/environment/product-recycling.html?jumpid=re_r138_eco_product-recycling#.UkTzV39c57c | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. If multiple questionnaires are received, the same percentage may be reported as long as the product types in question are collected and managed in the same program. Otherwise, the responses need to be for percentages appropriate to the different product types associated with each questionnaire. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | HP Product Return and Recycling Program | One example of a manufacturer takeback program is run by HP, where LaserJet and ink cartridges are collected, recycled, and materials used to manufacture new cartridges. | http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/environment/product-recycling.html?jumpid=re_r138_eco_product-recycling#.UkTzV39c57c | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. If multiple questionnaires are received, the same percentage may be reported as long as the product types in question are collected and managed in the same program. Otherwise, the responses need to be for percentages appropriate to the different product types associated with each questionnaire. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | HP Product Return and Recycling Program | One example of a manufacturer takeback program is run by HP, where LaserJet and ink cartridges are collected, recycled, and materials used to manufacture new cartridges. | http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/environment/product-recycling.html?jumpid=re_r138_eco_product-recycling#.UkTzV39c57c | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. If multiple questionnaires are received, the same percentage may be reported as long as the product types in question are collected and managed in the same program. Otherwise, the responses need to be for percentages appropriate to the different product types associated with each questionnaire. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | HP Product Return and Recycling Program | One example of a manufacturer takeback program is run by HP, where LaserJet and ink cartridges are collected, recycled, and materials used to manufacture new cartridges. | http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/environment/product-recycling.html?jumpid=re_r138_eco_product-recycling#.UkTzV39c57c | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. If multiple questionnaires are received, the same percentage may be reported as long as the product types in question are collected and managed in the same program. Otherwise, the responses need to be for percentages appropriate to the different product types associated with each questionnaire. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | HP Product Return and Recycling Program | One example of a manufacturer takeback program is run by HP, where LaserJet and ink cartridges are collected, recycled, and materials used to manufacture new cartridges. | http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/environment/product-recycling.html?jumpid=re_r138_eco_product-recycling#.UkTzV39c57c | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. If multiple questionnaires are received, the same percentage may be reported as long as the product types in question are collected and managed in the same program. Otherwise, the responses need to be for percentages appropriate to the different product types associated with each questionnaire. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | HP Product Return and Recycling Program | One example of a manufacturer takeback program is run by HP, where LaserJet and ink cartridges are collected, recycled, and materials used to manufacture new cartridges. | http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/environment/product-recycling.html?jumpid=re_r138_eco_product-recycling#.UkTzV39c57c | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. If multiple questionnaires are received, the same percentage may be reported as long as the product types in question are collected and managed in the same program. Otherwise, the responses need to be for percentages appropriate to the different product types associated with each questionnaire. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | HP Product Return and Recycling Program | One example of a manufacturer takeback program is run by HP, where LaserJet and ink cartridges are collected, recycled, and materials used to manufacture new cartridges. | http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/environment/product-recycling.html?jumpid=re_r138_eco_product-recycling#.UkTzV39c57c | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | Takeback program | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Displays | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electric Toothbrushes and Powered Oral Care Products | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Care Appliances | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitchen Appliances | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mobile Electronics | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Small Appliances | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal Care Appliances | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printer Ink | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | HP Product Return and Recycling Program | One example of a manufacturer takeback program is run by HP, where LaserJet and ink cartridges are collected, recycled, and materials used to manufacture new cartridges. | http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/environment/product-recycling.html?jumpid=re_r138_eco_product-recycling#.UkTzV39c57c | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | HP Product Return and Recycling Program | One example of a manufacturer takeback program is run by HP, where LaserJet and ink cartridges are collected, recycled, and materials used to manufacture new cartridges. | http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/environment/product-recycling.html?jumpid=re_r138_eco_product-recycling#.UkTzV39c57c | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Televisions | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Game Consoles | Product takeback program | This question addresses takeback programs that an organization may fund, contract, or physically operate, in whole or in part, to enable consumers to return products for responsible end-of-life management. Include only products and materials for which an organization has the ability to decide or influence the handling, treatment, and disposal of returned devices, components, and materials. These calculations should be made at the program level rather than category level. The same percentage can be reported across multiple product categories if the products are collected and managed in the same program. Separate programs require separate percentage calculations. For example, if two separate programs are run to collect hardware and printer ink cartridges, percentages for each program should be calculated separately and reported in the appropriate product category. _x000D_ Calculate B1, B2, B3, and B4 as the weight of products or materials recovered from products in each category, divided by the weight of total products recovered globally through both voluntary and mandatory programs, then multiply by 100. The sum of B1, B2, B3, and B4 must be less than or equal to 100%._x000D_ The weight for any given returned device can only be credited once. For example, a device whose weight is included in component reuse for a hard drive that was salvaged cannot also be included under the material recovery calculation, even if the rest of the materials from the device are sent for material recovery._x000D_ Material that is found or suspected to end in landfill or incineration through downstream auditing or the lack of a viable secondary market cannot be included in the material recovery percentage._x000D_ Components reused or refurbished means the percent of total volume representing parts that return to the market. Examples would be hard drives, motherboards, salvaged chips or other components removed for the secondary market._x000D_ Closed-loop system means that once material or components are recovered, they are returned to the materials supply chain for manufacturing new devices or products of the same value or greater value than the device that was recycled. For example, a closed loop system would be when printer ink cartridges are recycled and the recovered plastic is then used in new printer ink cartridges._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | R2 Certified Recyclers | According to the R2:2013 Standard, "certifying to this Standard through an accredited third-party Certification Body, electronics recyclers can help prospective purchasers of their services (customers) make informed decisions and have increased confidence that used and end -of-life electronic equipment are managed in an environmentally responsible manner, protective of the health and safety of workers and the public, and that all data on all media devices is secure until destroyed." | https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2-standard | e-Stewards | According to the e-Stewards Certification website, "The e-Stewards Certification Program provides a high level of confidence that a recycler consistently conforms to the e-Stewards Standard." | http://www.e-stewards.org/certification-overview/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Recycled content - Metal | This question addresses only post-consumer recycled metals of verified origin and includes metals embedded in components. Do not include packaging in this calculation._x000D_ Calculate B1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled metal divided by the total mass of metal used across all product units manufactured in this product category, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ Verification of post-consumer recycled metal content can be conducted by your own organization or by a second or third party. Examples include metal that has been recovered from a closed-loop recycling program or third-party certified recycled content. It does not include, for example, metals purchased that have a known average percentage of post-consumer recycled content, but an unknown chain of custody for that recycled content (e.g., metals purchased on the commodities markets). | Post-consumer recycled material | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Recycled content - Metal | This question addresses only post-consumer recycled metals of verified origin and includes metals embedded in components. Do not include packaging in this calculation._x000D_ Calculate B1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled metal divided by the total mass of metal used across all product units manufactured in this product category, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ Verification of post-consumer recycled metal content can be conducted by your own organization or by a second or third party. Examples include metal that has been recovered from a closed-loop recycling program or third-party certified recycled content. It does not include, for example, metals purchased that have a known average percentage of post-consumer recycled content, but an unknown chain of custody for that recycled content (e.g., metals purchased on the commodities markets). | Post-consumer recycled material | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Recycled content - Plastic | ?Do not include packaging in this calculation._x000D_ Calculate B1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled plastic used divided by the total mass of plastic used across all product units manufactured in this product category, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ Verification of post-consumer recycled plastic content can be conducted by your own organization or by a second or third party. Examples include plastic that has been recovered from a closed-loop recycling program or third-party certified recycled content. | Prospector | This searchable database from UL allows product designers to search for materials and ingredients that meet a set of user-defined specifications, including those that contain some amount of recycled content. | https://www.ulprospector.com/en/na | Post-consumer recycled material | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Recycled content - Plastic | ?Do not include packaging in this calculation._x000D_ Calculate B1 as the mass of post-consumer recycled plastic used divided by the total mass of plastic used across all product units manufactured in this product category, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ Verification of post-consumer recycled plastic content can be conducted by your own organization or by a second or third party. Examples include plastic that has been recovered from a closed-loop recycling program or third-party certified recycled content. | Prospector | This searchable database from UL allows product designers to search for materials and ingredients that meet a set of user-defined specifications, including those that contain some amount of recycled content. | https://www.ulprospector.com/en/na | Post-consumer recycled material | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Resource consumption - Product use | This question addresses only products that are certifiable under an in-force ENERGY STAR® product specification._x000D_ Calculate B1 as the total number of product units sold that qualified for ENERGY STAR certification divided by the total number of product units sold, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Products must be certified to the version of the ENERGY STAR specification that was in force when the product was manufactured. Products may be counted toward this percentage if they meet the criteria and are tested according to the methodology provided in the appropriate specification or standard, even if they are not certified as such. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | ENERGY STAR® Qualified Products | According to their website, "The ENERGY STAR label was established to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants caused by the inefficient use of energy and make it easy for consumers to identify and purchase energy-efficient products that offer savings on energy bills without sacrificing performance, features, and comfort." Standards are established by ENERGY STAR through a multi-stakeholder process and administered under the US EPA. | https://www.energystar.gov/products | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | Restriction of hazardous substances - Brominated flame retardants | Calculate C1 as the number of products sold in this category that are BFR-free, divided by the total number of products sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include only products that have no BFRs in their internal components such as printed wiring boards as well as their external housing or cabling as BFR-free products. Also include products where BFR content is solely related to recycled plastic content in housings or other external components, where the BFRs were not intentionally added to the components._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Informed substitution | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Displays | Restriction of hazardous substances - Brominated flame retardants | Calculate C1 as the number of products sold in this category that are BFR-free, divided by the total number of products sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include only products that have no BFRs in their internal components such as printed wiring boards as well as their external housing or cabling as BFR-free products. Also include products where BFR content is solely related to recycled plastic content in housings or other external components, where the BFRs were not intentionally added to the components._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Informed substitution | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mobile Electronics | Restriction of hazardous substances - Brominated flame retardants | Calculate C1 as the number of products sold in this category that are BFR-free, divided by the total number of products sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include only products that have no BFRs in their internal components such as printed wiring boards as well as their external housing or cabling as BFR-free products. Also include products where BFR content is solely related to recycled plastic content in housings or other external components, where the BFRs were not intentionally added to the components._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Informed substitution | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Restriction of hazardous substances - Brominated flame retardants | Calculate C1 as the number of products sold in this category that are BFR-free, divided by the total number of products sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include only products that have no BFRs in their internal components such as printed wiring boards as well as their external housing or cabling as BFR-free products. Also include products where BFR content is solely related to recycled plastic content in housings or other external components, where the BFRs were not intentionally added to the components._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Informed substitution | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Televisions | Restriction of hazardous substances - Brominated flame retardants | Calculate C1 as the number of products sold in this category that are BFR-free, divided by the total number of products sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include only products that have no BFRs in their internal components such as printed wiring boards as well as their external housing or cabling as BFR-free products. Also include products where BFR content is solely related to recycled plastic content in housings or other external components, where the BFRs were not intentionally added to the components._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Informed substitution | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Game Consoles | Restriction of hazardous substances - Brominated flame retardants | Calculate C1 as the number of products sold in this category that are BFR-free, divided by the total number of products sold in this category, then multiply by 100. Include only products that have no BFRs in their internal components such as printed wiring boards as well as their external housing or cabling as BFR-free products. Also include products where BFR content is solely related to recycled plastic content in housings or other external components, where the BFRs were not intentionally added to the components._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals | GreenScreen is a "Chemical Hazard Assessment" method that can be used to identify chemicals of high concern and determine safer alternatives. The tool was developed and is administered by Clean Production Action. A second tool, the GreenScreen List Translator, is a publicly available abbreviated version that screens and classifies chemicals based solely on their presence on authoritative hazard lists. | https://www.greenscreenchemicals.org/ | BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol | The BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol is a "decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives." | https://www.bizngo.org/alternatives-assessment/chemical-alternatives-assessment-protocol | NSF/GCI/ANSI 355-2011 - Greener Chemicals and Processes Information | According to this website, "The purpose of the Information Standard is to provide the chemical enterprise with a voluntary and standardized way to define and report environmental and human health hazards associated with a chemical product and its gate-to-gate manufacturing process impacts." | http://www.worldcat.org/title/nsfgciansi-355-2011-greener-chemicals-and-processes-information/oclc/772118815 | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Informed substitution | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities producing electronic components, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities, that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities producing electronic components, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities, that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Displays | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electric Toothbrushes and Powered Oral Care Products | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Care Appliances | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitchen Appliances | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mobile Electronics | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Small Appliances | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal Care Appliances | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Televisions | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Game Consoles | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities that have had a second- or third-party audit conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities, that have had a second- or third-party audit to a widely-recognized code of conduct conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities, that have had a second- or third-party audit to a widely-recognized code of conduct conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities, that have had a second- or third-party audit to a widely-recognized code of conduct conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities, that have had a second- or third-party audit to a widely-recognized code of conduct conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities, that have had a second- or third-party audit to a widely-recognized code of conduct conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities, that have had a second- or third-party audit to a widely-recognized code of conduct conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | Supply chain working conditions - Audit results | Calculate B1 as the number of events resolved, divided by the total number of events recorded during both second- and third-party audits conducted in the previous year, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract component manufacturing facilities, as well as all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities, that have had a second- or third-party audit to a widely-recognized code of conduct conducted in the past year. For B1, answer 100% if zero non-conformance events have been recorded across all facilities. A non-conformance event indicates an audit finding that would trigger a corrective action plan. For audits performed under the Responsible Business Alliance Validated Auditing Program (VAP), this includes priority, major, and minor non-conformance events._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | THESIS Help Center Video: Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI | Short video tutorial on the Supply chain working conditions - Audit results KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528319 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Responsible Business Alliance | The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), formerly known as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Council (EICC), supports an industry Code of Conduct that provides a common approach to drive positive change on social, economic and environmental issues in manufacturing supply chains. RBA offers a suite of tools and resources to their members to aid in assessing and managing change in supply chains, as well as coordinating audit processes across different companies. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/ | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printer Ink | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | Sustainable Packaging Design and Production | Calculate C1 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that was recyclable, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C2 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for material and process efficiency during packaging manufacturing, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Calculate C3 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated progress on goals for weight or volume optimization during packaging design, divided by the total mass of sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Goals must be quantitative and time-bound and progress must be reported publicly. Public reporting may include voluntary corporate reporting, sustainability reporting programs, or reporting as part of regulatory compliance._x000D_ Calculate C4 as the mass of sales packaging used for your final products that has demonstrated quantified environmental impact reductions, divided by the total mass sales packaging used for your final products, then multiply by 100. Include sales packaging with demonstrated impact reductions since the inception of the product or since purchase of the brand, if post-inception. _x000D_ Methods for demonstrating quantified environmental impact reduction include, but are not limited to, life cycle impact assessment, or assessment against ISO Standard 18602:2013 (Packaging and the environment -- Optimization of the packaging system), or EN 13428:2004 (Packaging: Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition - Prevention by source reduction)._x000D_ Calculate C5 as the number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled with How2Recycle divided by the total number of units sold in the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate C6 as the number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging labeled according to an established third-party standard divided by the total number of units sold in regions outside the US and Canada that had sales packaging, then multiply by 100. Third party standards include those listed in the Certifications, Standards & Tools section of this KPI. Only include regions outside the US and Canada that are covered by the referenced third-party standards in your calculations._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. | Woolworths Recycling Labels | Used in South Africa, the Woolworths Recycling Labels detail how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.woolworths.co.za/content/howto/good-business-journey/how-to-read-our-recycling-labels/_/A-cmp201960 | Walmart Sustainable Packaging Playbook | Walmart provides an overview of sustainable packaging best practices for suppliers interested in improving and innovating packaging. | https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/climate/project-gigaton/packaging | The Triman | Used in France, the Triman is a recycling symbol in e-commerce that sells and ships to France. | https://www.msl.io/uploads/downloads/Triman-Users-handbook-english-V21.pdf | Japanese Recycling Symbols | Used in Japan, Japanese recycling symbols tell in a glance to consumers what is recyclable and what is not recyclable, and assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://www.jcpra.or.jp/Portals/0/resource/eng/JCPRAdocuments202012.pdf | ISO 18602:2013 | ISO 18602 provides criteria for optimization of packaging systems. It outlines a procedure for reduction of packaging material weight or volume while taking into consideration packaging function. It also provides assessment methodology for substances hazardous to the environment and heavy metals. | https://www.iso.org/standard/55870.html | FTC Green Guide's Recyclability Definition | In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission defines when a product or packaging can be claimed recyclable. Please refer these guidelines when determining recyclability. | https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-issues-revised-green-guides/greenguides.pdf | European Certification of Plastics Recycling (EUCertPlast) | The EuCertPlast Certification is a European wide certification program for companies that recycle post-consumer plastic waste. | https://www.eucertplast.eu/ | Circulytics - Measuring circularity | The Ellen Macarthur Foundation's Circulytics assesses a company’s overall circularity. The tool is designed to support a company’s evolution to a circular economy by informing strategy development and decision making, and identifying opportunities to align with circular economy principles including: designing out waste, keeping materials and products in use, and generating environmental benefits. | https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity | Ecoembes Recycling Symbols | Used in Spain, the Ecoembes recycling symbols provide information to consumers for the recycling of packaging up to six different colors: blue for paper and cardboard, yellow for plastics and cans, green for glass, orange for organic materials, red for hazardous waste, and grey for everything else. | https://www.ecoembes.com/en/home | Australasian Recycling Label (ARL) | Used in Australia and New Zealand, the ARL details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | https://recyclingnearyou.com.au/arl/ | The Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) | The APR is an international national trade association representing the plastics recycling industry. | https://plasticsrecycling.org/about | Le Guide du TRI (Citeo Sorting Guide) | sed in France, the Citeo Sorting Guide provides information to companies about which product components should be recycled and which should be disposed. | https://bo.citeo.com/sites/default/files/2019-07/20190617_Guide_Info-tri_Citeo_EN.pdf | On-Pack Recycling Label | Used in the UK, the On-Pack Recycling Label details how best to label packaging for recycling to assist consumers in recycling correctly. | http://www.oprl.org.uk/ | How2Recycle Certification | The How2Recycle Label provides guidance to consumers on how to recycle packaging for consumable goods. The label is intended to be used on all types of packaging and to provide instruction regarding how and where various raw materials can be recycled. | http://www.how2recycle.info/ | EN 13428: Prevention by packaging source reduction | European standard 13428:2004 outlines a method for evaluating if packaging material weight and/or volume have been sufficiently minimized while also taking into consideration other packaging performance parameters. The standard also includes recommended methodology for identifying heavy metals and dangerous substances in packaging formats. | http://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/packaging/index_en.htm | Goals | Sales packaging | Material and process efficiency | Weight or volume optimization | Third-party audit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electric Toothbrushes and Powered Oral Care Products | Transportation to Retailers | Include shipments of your product from final manufacturing facilities to downstream retailers or distributors. Include both company-owned and contracted fleet. Exclude data for return trips. If retailers are responsible for the transportation of some or all of your final product, the retailer may hold the information necessary to calculate your response. It may be made available in a public report or by request. Calculate B1 as the volume of product transported by carriers that reported emissions, divided by total volume of product transported, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If a supplier completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, you may count that as compliance with this question. Examples of other compliant standards are provided in the Certifications, Standards, & Tools section below. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Transportation and Air Quality: SmartWay | This program provides information about how to improve fuel efficiency in trucking. Carriers can use the SmartWay carbon emission calculator to track and publicly report emissions associated with their trucking operations. | https://www.epa.gov/smartway | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | THESIS Help Center Video: Transportation to Retailers KPI | Short video tutorial on the Transportation to Retailers KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/529545735 | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Care Appliances | Transportation to Retailers | Include shipments of your product from final manufacturing facilities to downstream retailers or distributors. Include both company-owned and contracted fleet. Exclude data for return trips. If retailers are responsible for the transportation of some or all of your final product, the retailer may hold the information necessary to calculate your response. It may be made available in a public report or by request. Calculate B1 as the volume of product transported by carriers that reported emissions, divided by total volume of product transported, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If a supplier completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, you may count that as compliance with this question. Examples of other compliant standards are provided in the Certifications, Standards, & Tools section below. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Transportation and Air Quality: SmartWay | This program provides information about how to improve fuel efficiency in trucking. Carriers can use the SmartWay carbon emission calculator to track and publicly report emissions associated with their trucking operations. | https://www.epa.gov/smartway | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | THESIS Help Center Video: Transportation to Retailers KPI | Short video tutorial on the Transportation to Retailers KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/529545735 | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitchen Appliances | Transportation to Retailers | Include shipments of your product from final manufacturing facilities to downstream retailers or distributors. Include both company-owned and contracted fleet. Exclude data for return trips. If retailers are responsible for the transportation of some or all of your final product, the retailer may hold the information necessary to calculate your response. It may be made available in a public report or by request. Calculate B1 as the volume of product transported by carriers that reported emissions, divided by total volume of product transported, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If a supplier completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, you may count that as compliance with this question. Examples of other compliant standards are provided in the Certifications, Standards, & Tools section below. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Transportation and Air Quality: SmartWay | This program provides information about how to improve fuel efficiency in trucking. Carriers can use the SmartWay carbon emission calculator to track and publicly report emissions associated with their trucking operations. | https://www.epa.gov/smartway | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | THESIS Help Center Video: Transportation to Retailers KPI | Short video tutorial on the Transportation to Retailers KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/529545735 | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Small Appliances | Transportation to Retailers | Include shipments of your product from final manufacturing facilities to downstream retailers or distributors. Include both company-owned and contracted fleet. Exclude data for return trips. If retailers are responsible for the transportation of some or all of your final product, the retailer may hold the information necessary to calculate your response. It may be made available in a public report or by request. Calculate B1 as the volume of product transported by carriers that reported emissions, divided by total volume of product transported, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If a supplier completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, you may count that as compliance with this question. Examples of other compliant standards are provided in the Certifications, Standards, & Tools section below. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Transportation and Air Quality: SmartWay | This program provides information about how to improve fuel efficiency in trucking. Carriers can use the SmartWay carbon emission calculator to track and publicly report emissions associated with their trucking operations. | https://www.epa.gov/smartway | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | THESIS Help Center Video: Transportation to Retailers KPI | Short video tutorial on the Transportation to Retailers KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/529545735 | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal Care Appliances | Transportation to Retailers | Include shipments of your product from final manufacturing facilities to downstream retailers or distributors. Include both company-owned and contracted fleet. Exclude data for return trips. If retailers are responsible for the transportation of some or all of your final product, the retailer may hold the information necessary to calculate your response. It may be made available in a public report or by request. Calculate B1 as the volume of product transported by carriers that reported emissions, divided by total volume of product transported, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If a supplier completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, you may count that as compliance with this question. Examples of other compliant standards are provided in the Certifications, Standards, & Tools section below. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Transportation and Air Quality: SmartWay | This program provides information about how to improve fuel efficiency in trucking. Carriers can use the SmartWay carbon emission calculator to track and publicly report emissions associated with their trucking operations. | https://www.epa.gov/smartway | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | THESIS Help Center Video: Transportation to Retailers KPI | Short video tutorial on the Transportation to Retailers KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/529545735 | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printer Ink | Transportation to Retailers | Include shipments of your product from final manufacturing facilities to downstream retailers or distributors. Include both company-owned and contracted fleet. Exclude data for return trips. If retailers are responsible for the transportation of some or all of your final product, the retailer may hold the information necessary to calculate your response. It may be made available in a public report or by request. Calculate B1 as the volume of product transported by carriers that reported emissions, divided by total volume of product transported, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If a supplier completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, you may count that as compliance with this question. Examples of other compliant standards are provided in the Certifications, Standards, & Tools section below. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Transportation and Air Quality: SmartWay | This program provides information about how to improve fuel efficiency in trucking. Carriers can use the SmartWay carbon emission calculator to track and publicly report emissions associated with their trucking operations. | https://www.epa.gov/smartway | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | THESIS Help Center Video: Transportation to Retailers KPI | Short video tutorial on the Transportation to Retailers KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/529545735 | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Transportation to Retailers | Include shipments of your product from final manufacturing facilities to downstream retailers or distributors. Include both company-owned and contracted fleet. Exclude data for return trips. If retailers are responsible for the transportation of some or all of your final product, the retailer may hold the information necessary to calculate your response. It may be made available in a public report or by request. Calculate B1 as the volume of product transported by carriers that reported emissions, divided by total volume of product transported, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If a supplier completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, you may count that as compliance with this question. Examples of other compliant standards are provided in the Certifications, Standards, & Tools section below. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Transportation and Air Quality: SmartWay | This program provides information about how to improve fuel efficiency in trucking. Carriers can use the SmartWay carbon emission calculator to track and publicly report emissions associated with their trucking operations. | https://www.epa.gov/smartway | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | THESIS Help Center Video: Transportation to Retailers KPI | Short video tutorial on the Transportation to Retailers KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/529545735 | Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Calculation Tools | This site provides a list of sector toolsets developed by GHG Protocol, third-party databases, and other tools based on the GHG Protocol standards that can be used to calculate greenhouse gas inventories for use in emissions calculations. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Transportation to Retailers | Include shipments of your product from final manufacturing facilities to downstream retailers or distributors. Include both company-owned and contracted fleet. Exclude data for return trips. If retailers are responsible for the transportation of some or all of your final product, the retailer may hold the information necessary to calculate your response. It may be made available in a public report or by request. Calculate B1 as the volume of product transported by carriers that reported emissions, divided by total volume of product transported, then multiply by 100. Reporting can occur through public disclosure or private disclosure from the supplier to your organization directly or through another party. Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. If a supplier completed the CDP Climate Change 2020 Questionnaire, you may count that as compliance with this question. Examples of other compliant standards are provided in the Certifications, Standards, & Tools section below. | United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Transportation and Air Quality: SmartWay | This program provides information about how to improve fuel efficiency in trucking. Carriers can use the SmartWay carbon emission calculator to track and publicly report emissions associated with their trucking operations. | https://www.epa.gov/smartway | CDP Climate Change Questionnaire | The CDP Climate Change Questionnaire provides questions that assess a company's greenhouse gas emissions, goals, and management. The report provided by CDP provides the overview of the results from companies responding to the request. | https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-companies | THESIS Help Center Video: Transportation to Retailers KPI | Short video tutorial on the Transportation to Retailers KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/529545735 | GHG Protocol Calculation Tools - Semiconductors | The GHG Protocol calculation tool for the semiconductor industry provides guidance on how to assess and account for PFC emissions during semiconductor wafer production and processing. | https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printer Ink | Water consumption - De-inking paper for recycling | Improving the recyclability of printed paper refers specifically to the removal of inks or toner in order to achieve recycled fiber with a high level of brightness. _x000D_ Reducing the costs and environmental impacts associated with de-inking can be accomplished through reductions in the use of energy, water and chemicals during the de-inking process. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printer Ink | Worker health and safety - Supply chain | To determine if a country is low risk or high risk for worker health and safety violations for B1, utilize a country risk analysis tool. The tool should measure the strength of a country's ability to govern and enforce laws, regulations, and internationally recognized principles. This assessment may be a first party systematic review assessment, or external risk analyses tools may be utilized. It must be conducted at least once per year._x000D_ On-site risk assessments and audits, where necessary, can be conducted by second or third parties and must have been conducted at least once every two years using a standard based on internationally recognized principles. The assessments, audits, and standard must be verifiable and must address worker injury and worker exposure to harmful elements, and must align with applicable International Labour Organization Occupational Safety and Health Conventions (e.g., No. 155)._x000D_ Include as ingredients all materials used in ink and toners sold by your organization._x000D_ Calculate B1 as the mass of ingredients used in your final product that came from low-risk countries with corrective actions taken for any known high-risk sites, divided by the total mass of ingredients used in your final product, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate B2 as the mass of ingredients used in your final product that came from high-risk countries that have high-risk sites for which you took corrective actions, divided by the total mass of ingredients used in your final product, then multiply by 100. _x000D_ Calculate B3 as the mass of ingredients used in your final product that came from high-risk countries, but an audit determined the site risk to be low, divided by the total mass of ingredients used in your final product, then multiply by 100._x000D_ Perform these calculations using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question. _x000D_ The sum of B1, B2, and B3 must not exceed 100%. _x000D_ The Business Social Compliance Initiative Countries' Risk Classification tool listed below may be used to inform your response for B1._x000D_ The standards and websites listed in Background Information below may be helpful for conducting your on-site risk assessment(s) and for understanding appropriate corrective actions, which can inform your response for B2._x000D_ The certifications listed below may be used to calculate your response for B3._x000D_ Other standards, certifications, and tools may also be applicable. | United Nations Global Compact Human Rights and Business Dilemmas Forum | United Nations Global Compact Human Rights and Business Dilemmas Forum present an introduction to, analysis of, and business recommendations for minimizing social sustainability risks in the supply chain. | https://www.unglobalcompact.org/library/9 | Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit | Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit is an auditing system that aligns with Ethical Trading Initiative's Base Code as well International Labour Organization Conventions. It has been developed to provide a public auditing methodology and format for companies to use to assess compliance. | https://www.sedex.com/our-services/smeta-audit/ | THESIS Help Center Video: Worker health and safety - Supply chain KPI | Short video tutorial on the Worker health and safety - Supply chain KPI. Use case-sensitive password 'thesis' when prompted. | https://vimeo.com/536528345 | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Amfori Country Risk Classification | This list classifies countries' risk of social injustice in an effort to assist companies in determining high and low risk for their sourcing and operations. | http://duediligence.amfori.org/CountryRiskClassification | Third-party audit | Corrective actions | First party systematic risk assessment | Second-party audit | Worker exposure to harmful elements | Worker injury | Verifiable | Risk assessment | Worker health and safety | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refrigeration Appliances | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities producing electronic components, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washing Appliances | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities producing electronic components, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audio and Video Peripherals and Accessories | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cameras | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer and Gaming Peripherals and Accessories | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computers | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Displays | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electric Toothbrushes and Powered Oral Care Products | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entertainment Electronics | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Care Appliances | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kitchen Appliances | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mobile Electronics | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Networking Equipment | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Electronics | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Small Appliances | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal Care Appliances | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printers and Scanners | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Security Electronics | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Televisions | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Battery Alliance (RBA) Supply Chain Accountability Tools | RBA supports multiple tools for members that enable self-assessment, third-party auditing, and online sustainability data management systems of this information. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/tools/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Game Consoles | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Facilities eligible for inclusion in the reported percentage are those that have either been deemed low risk through a verifiable assessment, or high-risk facilities audited by a third party. A verifiable assessment can include an on-site audit by a second party or third party, or a first-party systematic risk assessment against a code of conduct to determine risk based on conditions, controls, or other mitigating factors. _x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those outlined in the in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct: Child labor; Compensation; Discipline; Discrimination; Forced labor; Freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; Health and safety; Management systems for human resources; Working hours. | Ethical Trading Initiative Base Code of Labor Practices | This organization works in partnership to improve the working lives of poor and vulnerable people across the globe that make or grow consumer goods. ETI has a Base Code of Labor Practice and provides guidance and resources for implementing it. | https://www.ethicaltrade.org/resources/eti-base-code | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ | Cradle to Cradle Product Certification™ provides a standard of performance for manufacturers regarding product sustainability and material safety. Individual product assessments are performed by independent and trained third parties and certifications are made by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. | http://www.c2ccertified.org/product_certification | Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) Reference Tools | The Global Social Compliance Program provides a publicly available suite of reference tools that describes existing best practices in social compliance. The reference tools can be used by companies to develop systems and initiatives. | http://supply-chain.unglobalcompact.org/site/article/126 | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | First party systematic risk assessment | Verifiable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Audio and Video | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those in the current, in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct, including: Child labor; compensation; discipline; discrimination; forced labor; freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; health and safety; management systems for human resources; working hours. | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Verifiable | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automotive Electronics | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those in the current, in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct, including: Child labor; compensation; discipline; discrimination; forced labor; freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; health and safety; management systems for human resources; working hours. | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Verifiable | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Computer Drives and Storage | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those in the current, in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct, including: Child labor; compensation; discipline; discrimination; forced labor; freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; health and safety; management systems for human resources; working hours. | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Verifiable | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electronics Chargers and Adapters | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those in the current, in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct, including: Child labor; compensation; discipline; discrimination; forced labor; freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; health and safety; management systems for human resources; working hours. | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Verifiable | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Office Electronics and Appliances | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those in the current, in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct, including: Child labor; compensation; discipline; discrimination; forced labor; freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; health and safety; management systems for human resources; working hours. | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Verifiable | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Strips and Cables | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those in the current, in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct, including: Child labor; compensation; discipline; discrimination; forced labor; freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; health and safety; management systems for human resources; working hours. | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Verifiable | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wearable Electronics | Worker health, safety, and labor rights | Calculate C1 as the number of facilities that have been audited by a third party in the last twelve months, divided by the total number of company-owned or contact facilities, then multiply by 100. Include all tier 1 company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities, and all component manufacturing facilities that are directly contracted to supply custom parts or materials to company-owned or contract product assembly facilities._x000D_ Perform this calculation using data from a 12-month period that ended within 12 months of the date you respond to this question._x000D_ The code of conduct must cover the following issues with requirements that meet or exceed those in the current, in-force Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct, including: Child labor; compensation; discipline; discrimination; forced labor; freedom of association and right to collective bargaining; health and safety; management systems for human resources; working hours. | SA8000® Standard | Social Accountability International (SAI) is a global non-governmental organization that aims to advance human rights at work via the SA8000® Standard. SA 8000 measures social performance in eight areas that are relevant for workplaces in factories and organizations worldwide. | https://sa-intl.org/programs/sa8000/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Validated Audit Process (VAP) provides members the ability to audit manufacturing facilities within their supply chain and share audit results with other members to better leverage information on common upstream supplier facilities. Organizations that are not members of RBA but own facilities that are in the electronics supply chain may also participate in this effort. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/vap/ | Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct | Companies can use the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct with their suppliers to improve the working conditions within facilities in their supply chain, the most recent version of which can be found on their website. The Code of Conduct was originally developed for use within the electronics industry, but has been revised to ensure relevance across most manufacturing sectors. | http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/standards/code-of-conduct/ | Second-party audit | Third-party audit | Verifiable | Company-owned or contract manufacturing facilities |